Saturday, September 21, 2019
Strategic Management Industry Structures And Dynamics Business Strategy Essay
Strategic Management Industry Structures And Dynamics Business Strategy Essay    Introduction: Dell Company was founded in 1984 by Michael Dell. It is the worlds largest  direct-sale computer vendor; Dell Inc. is now also the leading seller of computer systems in the  world, capturing a global market share of more than 15 percent. Dell markets desktop personal  computers, notebook computers, network servers, workstations, handheld computers, monitors,  printers, high-end storage products, and a variety of computer peripherals and software. In this  part I will use Porters Five Forces to analysis Dells great success in the industry.  Force 1: The Degree of Rivalry.  The PC industry consists of a number of companies; hence the threat from industry competitors  is high. Due to the product being highly standardized and shifting costs between brands is low,  there is fierce competition which leads to lower margins and profitability in the market. The PC  industry can be described as a high competitive industry. For Dell the main competitors are IBM,  Apple, HP, TOSHIBA, Gateway etc. Dell uses several strategies to reduce the competitive rivalry  between existing players.  Firstly Dell differentiated its sales from other competitors. Dell used the direct sales strategy since  1984. To sell PCs directly to consumers, by passing retail stores and system integrators and  offering limited customer support but dramatically lower prices. For years, that direct, low-cost  sales model worked perfectly. It allowed Dell to make high margins while selling computer gear  for less than its rivals. As a result, it now holds a leading 17.9% share of the world PC market and  has grown much faster than competitors Hewlett-Packard and IBM. With thousands of phone  and fax orders daily, $5 million in daily Internet sales, and daily contacts between the field sales  force and customers of all types, the company kept its finger on the market pulse, quickly  detecting shifts in sales trends and getting prompt feedback on any problems with its products. If  the company got more than a few similar complaints, the information was relayed immediately  to design engineers. When design flaws or components defects were found, the factory was  notified and the problem corrected within a matter of days. Management believed Dells ability  to respond quickly gave it a significant advantage over rivals, particularly over PC makers in Asia,  which made large production runs and sold standardized products through retail channels. Dell  saw its direct sales approach as a totally customer-driven system that allowed quick transitions to  new generations of components and PC models. i  Secondly Dell provided good customer service to compete with its rivals. In 1986 the company  began providing a guarantee of free on-site service for a year with most of its PCs after users  complained about having to ship their PCs back to Austin for repairs. Dell contracted with local  service providers to handle customer requests for repairs; on-site service was provided on a  next-day basis. Dell also provided its customers with technical support via a toll-free number, fax,  and e-mail. Dell received close to 40,000 e-mail messages monthly requesting service and  support and had 25 technicians to process the requests. iiBundled service policies were a major  selling point for winning corporate accounts. If a customer preferred to work with his or her own  service provider, Dell gave that provider the training and spare parts needed to service the  customers equipment.  Force 2: The Threat of new Entry.  Firstly, Dell created a brand image to reduce the threat of new entries by advertising. Dell was the  first computer company to use comparative ads. Its advertisements have appeared in several  types of media including television, the Internet, magazines, catalogs and newspapers.  Secondly, Dell cuts its price or offering free bonus products in the effect to maintain its market  share. In 2006, Dell cut its price in an effort to maintain its 19.2% market share. However, this  also cut profit-margins by more than half, from 8.7 to 4.3 percent. To maintain the strategy Dell  continuing to accept the online and telephone purchase.  The brand loyalty and the low price built up a barrier of entry for the new companies.  Force 3: The Threat of Substitutes.  Other devices like PDA, handheld electronics etc. are now coming out with features similar to  PCs. The mobilebility is the key factor of the competition. Dell generate a smaller size laptop  called mini which only has a 10.1 inch screen and only sells at the price under à £200 which is  even lower than some of the handheld electronics. With the efficiency of mobile and the same  function, for example Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, Dell protects its market share against those  substitutes.  Force 4: Bargaining Power of Customers.  Dell built up its brand loyalty to reduce the bargaining power of customers.  First, Dell had its own system and strategy to manage the relationship with customers. Since Dell  use the direct sale strategy, customers can buy Dells products from the website or ordered by  phone or fax. The customers then can personalize their computer by choosing the configuration  of the computer (e.g. RAM, processors, and hard-disk capacity). On the Dells website from which  people can directly choose, buy and give feedback, it divided the customers into four major  groups home users, small medium business, public sector and large enterprise. Dell then treats  different groups differently by offering the special service they need from different groups. For  instance, Dell provides special solutions and services for higher education. Such as data  consolidation and management, HPC (high performance computing environments), wireless  solution, connected classroom etc. Because of its direct sale strategy, Dell can easily track the  service for any individual buyers. All the buyer information will be stored in its system; dell can  differentiate customers and send relevant product information and services to different  customers. These special strategies in selling upgrade its brand image among customers.  Second, Dell uses the advertisements to help building up its brand image. On the website, TV,  newspaper, high street, people can easily find dells advertising. Those can not only increase dells  market activity but also increase its brand pride.  Force 5: Reducing the Bargaining Power of Suppliers.  Dell has a special understanding on the SCM (supply chain management). Dells strategy is to limit  the amount of supplier but pick up some outstanding supplier all over the world. Each supplier  has a very close relationship with Dell in long-term. Dell uses its huge globe market to share its  business with its entire suppliers. For instance, Dell built a assemble factory in Malaysia, its  supplier from Ireland soon built a factory in there as well in order to gain a geographic efficiency.  Dell had its assemble factories all over the world which relatively close to its suppliers. This will  save a lot of transport costs. The double-win strategy makes the supply chain works well. With  the double-win strategy and constant relationship, Dell will be able to ask lower price from the  suppliers and reduce the bargaining power from them.  Market part: Segmentation  Introduction: Michael Dell emphasized the significant status of customers to the companys  business by stating Finding ways to get close to your customers is critical to your success. Since  different people would have different need from the computer, Dell divided its customers into  several segments by discovering special needs from each segment. In the year 1994, the  customer group was only divided by two primary customer and normal customer. In that year  the assets of Dell is 3.5billion USD. In July 1996 Dell launched its online website www.dell.com.  On the website primary client are divided into three segments which are large company, medium  company and government education. Customers can easily choose and buy the products  directly with advices and helps from dell.com. The assets of Dell rocketed up to 7.8 billion USD in  that year. However in 1997, Dell continued differentiating its customer for more segments.  Government  education segment was divided to State  Local Government, Federal  Government and education. Small company and home users were also been created as individual  segments. The net revenue of Dell was 12 billion in that year.  On todays Dells website, people will be able to follow the tips and choose a suitable computer in  few minutes. Whats more, customers can personalize their chosen computer by changing the  configuration of the computer (e.g. color, RAM, processors, and hard-disk capacity). With this  direct sale through different segments, Dell can start to assemble the computer once the  transaction has been made. The inventory can then be limited as low as zero. Not like Dells  competitors, Dell does not need many warehouses all over the world which will save a lot of  costs for the company.  Although on todays Dell.com, customers are divided into a lot segments. However, literally  customers are differentiated into two segments; Relationship customers in opposing  Transaction customers. Although Dell intends to build and maintain a good relationship with all  customers, it also becomes clear, that the company would regard some customers more  relationship worthy than others, by analyzing customer value.  The relationship customers are mainly large enterprise and government etc. which occupied 40%  of Dells entire customer. Transaction customers are small business and home users which have  percentage of 30 among customers. The remaining 30 percentage customer is regarded as a  mixed customer.  The advantage for dividing customers in different segment is that the company would be able to  analysis how it can encourage the customers to buy its product. For individual users or small  business price is the priority. Those customers are regarded as more price insensitive. So for  home and small business users the price is slightly lower than its competitors e.g. HP, Toshiba  and Sony. For bigger customers such as the government or enterprise, they consider more than  the price but consequent services and supports. Take large enterprise for instance, Dell supports  a lots of specific services and solutions for running the business. Like Infrastructure Consulting  service which is basically a plan for simplifying IT infrastructure, helping reduce operating costs  while freeing up resources for new business initiatives.iii Also, Dell runs a program called Dell  business Creditiv. This is the same as a loan offered by Dell, but with no interest rate and anytime  to pay off the balance. Business without enough cash flow would like to take that program.  One of the Dells competitors is IBM, it has a clearly customer segmentation but different from  Dell. IBM is more focusing on Business and Industry market. In a simply word it is even more  focusing on the Big customers. Similar as Dell did for big client, but even did more specific for  the segmentation. For Dell there is no segment for industries like Aerospace, Chemicals and  petroleum. More segmentation on large customers also brings more services and solutions for all  kinds of industries. One of IBMs famous solutions is offering the security management for  Wimbledonv. It provided the security solution for players, staff, media and spectators around the  world.  Conclusion: Dells market share was No.2 in 2009, IBM was far behind. But since Dells customer  groups is much bigger than IBMs. In 2006 IBM sold its PC department to Lenovo, Lenovo used  IBMs brand to product and sell IBMs ThinkPad series. It is very difficult to compare which  segmentation is better. But for the large business users, IBM is a very strong competitor against  Dell, Its high performance computer and advanced technical solutions and services makes IBM  the biggest company for larger business and industries.  i scribd.com Dell operation  ii McGraw Hill Dell Computer Corporation  mhhe.com/business/management/thompson/11e/case/dell5.html  iii Dell.com Large Enterprise service  iv Dell.com business credit  v IBM.com Wimbledon case study    
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.